Skip to main content

Vultr CPU Optimized AMD 1 vCPU / 2 GB

Los Angeles, US

Benchmark complete
Finished Oct 11, 2026
Geekbench 7 single-core
1,762
Geekbench 7 multi-core
Skipped
Disk 4K IOPS
84,575
fio random read and write, 50/50
Monthly price at test time
$28.00
Same price today

Server

  • Provider
    Vultr
  • Plan
    CPU Optimized AMD 1 vCPU / 2 GB
  • Location
    Los Angeles, US
  • vCPU
    1
  • RAM
    2 GB
  • Storage
    25 GB NVMe
  • Network
    Unknown
  • OS image
    2284
  • Trigger
    Scheduled
  • Queued at
    Oct 11, 2026, 18:37:00 UTC
Visit Vultr

Referral link. If you sign up through it, I may get paid. How this works

CPU

Version Single-core Multi-core Result link
Geekbench 7 1,762 Skipped Geekbench Browser

Multi-core was skipped because Geekbench 7 needs about 2.1 GB of free memory to run 1 thread, and this server didn't have that much. Single-core needs much less, so it still ran.

Scores from different Geekbench versions aren't comparable with each other. Charts only use Geekbench 7.

Geekbench 7 workloads

Workload Single-core Multi-core
File Compression
1,779
15th of 106
Single-core only
Navigation
1,878
5th of 106
Single-core only
HTML5 Browser
1,819
13th of 106
Single-core only
PDF Viewer
1,825
16th of 106
Single-core only
Photo Library
1,635
19th of 106
Single-core only
Clang
1,643
13th of 106
Single-core only
Text Processing
1,632
16th of 106
Single-core only
Asset Compression
1,791
16th of 106
Single-core only
HDR
1,833
16th of 106
Single-core only
Photo Editor
1,726
28th of 106
Single-core only
Ray Tracer
1,723
8th of 106
Single-core only
Structure from Motion
1,763
20th of 106
Single-core only
Game Physics
1,732
13th of 106
Single-core only
Video Encoder
1,795
14th of 106
Single-core only
Audio Encoder
1,785
17th of 106
Single-core only
Video Player
1,859
18th of 106
Single-core only

Rank among the 106 runs with Geekbench 7 workload scores. Bars are relative to the best run. Geekbench doesn't run every workload multi-core, so some rows only have a single-core score.

Memory, TLS and scheduler

Memory bandwidth (STREAM)

Test Result Runs Spread
Copy higher is better 32 GB/s 3 0.734%
Scale higher is better 38.6 GB/s 3 2.64%
Add higher is better 36.4 GB/s 3 0.245%
Triad higher is better 36.2 GB/s 3 0.373%

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

TLS and crypto (OpenSSL)

Test Result Runs Spread
RSA 4096 signs higher is better 179/s 3 0.0968%
RSA 4096 verifies higher is better 11,705/s 3 0.173%
SHA-256 higher is better 1.02 GB/s 3 0.323%
AES-256-GCM higher is better 4.59 GB/s 3 0.0938%
ChaCha20-Poly1305 higher is better 2.39 GB/s 3 0.263%

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

Scheduler latency (schbench)

Test Result Runs Spread
Request latency, median lower is better 3.92 ms 3 0.353%
Requests per second, 90th percentile higher is better 252/s 3 0.229%
Request latency, 99.9th percentile lower is better 7.34 ms 3 0.126%
Requests per second, average higher is better 252/s 3 0.271%

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

Disk

Block size Read Write Total
4K 165 MB/s (42,232 IOPS) 165.4 MB/s (42,343 IOPS) 330.4 MB/s (84,575 IOPS)
64K 2.17 GB/s (35,523 IOPS) 2.18 GB/s (35,710 IOPS) 4.35 GB/s (71,233 IOPS)
512K 2.36 GB/s (4,836 IOPS) 2.49 GB/s (5,093 IOPS) 4.85 GB/s (9,929 IOPS)
1M 2.47 GB/s (2,528 IOPS) 2.63 GB/s (2,696 IOPS) 5.1 GB/s (5,224 IOPS)

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

Network

IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...
Target Protocol Send Receive
Clouvider, London, UK (10G) IPv4 1.3 Gbps 1.67 Gbps
Eranium, Amsterdam, NL (100G) IPv4 5.57 Gbps 8.59 Gbps
Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) IPv4 4.58 Gbps 5.88 Gbps
Clouvider, Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) IPv4 8.46 Gbps 9.07 Gbps
Leaseweb, NYC, NY, US (10G) IPv4 6.3 Gbps 7.59 Gbps

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

Datastores

PostgreSQL

fsync speed (pg_test_fsync)

Method Operations per second Time per operation
One 8 kB write
open_datasync 11,020 0.091 ms
fdatasync 10,442 0.096 ms
fsync 9,012 0.111 ms
fsync_writethrough Not supported here n/a
open_sync 9,592 0.104 ms
Two 8 kB writes
open_datasync 5,385 0.186 ms
fdatasync 9,794 0.102 ms
fsync 8,786 0.114 ms
fsync_writethrough Not supported here n/a
open_sync 4,734 0.211 ms
open_sync at different write sizes
1 * 16kB open_sync write 9,294 0.108 ms
2 * 8kB open_sync writes 4,836 0.207 ms
4 * 4kB open_sync writes 2,428 0.412 ms
8 * 2kB open_sync writes 1,176 0.85 ms
16 * 1kB open_sync writes 578 1.73 ms
fsync on a non-write descriptor
write, fsync, close 8,239 0.121 ms
write, close, fsync 8,094 0.124 ms
Non-synced 8 kB writes
write 665,143 0.002 ms

pg_test_fsync against the Docker volume Postgres keeps its data on. fdatasync is Linux's default wal_sync_method.

pgbench at scale 10

Workload Clients Transactions/s Median p95 p99 p99.9 Failed
Read/write (TPC-B like) 1 3,156 0.305 ms 0.353 ms 0.527 ms 1.5 ms 0
Read/write (TPC-B like) 8 3,527 2.12 ms 3.33 ms 4.28 ms 5.97 ms 0
Read/write (TPC-B like) 32 3,357 8.12 ms 18.9 ms 29.5 ms 46.4 ms 0
Read only 1 40,185 0.024 ms 0.032 ms 0.039 ms 0.063 ms 0
Read only 8 39,148 0.175 ms 0.289 ms 0.351 ms 0.67 ms 0
Read only 32 37,799 0.725 ms 1.22 ms 1.38 ms 2.12 ms 0

Scale 10 (1,000,000 accounts), loaded in 1.23 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

pgbench at scale 100

Workload Clients Transactions/s Median p95 p99 p99.9 Failed
Read/write (TPC-B like) 1 1,709 0.545 ms 0.759 ms 1.52 ms 2.55 ms 0
Read/write (TPC-B like) 8 2,742 2.75 ms 4.3 ms 5.84 ms 8.5 ms 0
Read/write (TPC-B like) 32 2,924 10.2 ms 15.5 ms 19.2 ms 27.5 ms 0
Read only 1 6,661 0.193 ms 0.259 ms 0.47 ms 1.37 ms 0
Read only 8 21,372 0.264 ms 0.754 ms 1.24 ms 2.37 ms 0
Read only 32 22,950 1.16 ms 1.75 ms 2.71 ms 4.2 ms 0

Scale 100 (10,000,000 accounts), loaded in 14 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

MySQL

sysbench OLTP

Workload Threads Transactions/s Queries/s Median p95 p99 Errors
Read/write 1 553 11,059 1.64 ms 2.66 ms 4.65 ms 0
Read/write 8 638 12,762 11.4 ms 20 ms 31.9 ms 0
Read/write 32 679 13,578 42.6 ms 83 ms 111 ms 0
Read only 1 1,432 22,917 0.665 ms 0.92 ms 1.32 ms 0
Read only 8 1,355 21,686 5.88 ms 6.67 ms 7.7 ms 0
Read only 32 1,261 20,176 25.3 ms 29.2 ms 31.9 ms 0

10 tables of 100,000 rows, loaded in 10.2 s. 60 s per run, one connection per thread.

Redis

memtier

Mix Operations/s Hits/s Median p99 p99.9
1:10 set:get 39,981 36,346 1.55 ms 2.98 ms 4.16 ms
1:1 set:get 39,681 19,840 1.55 ms 3.01 ms 4.22 ms

1,000,000 keys of 32 bytes. 64 connections over 1 thread, 60 s per ratio.

Web frameworks

Framework Fortunes req/s Single query req/s JSON req/s Fortunes p99 at 256 connections
Next.js nextjs 427 1,455 2,136 939 ms
Express express-postgresjs 4,425 6,763 24,320 614 ms
Fastify fastify-postgres 4,346 6,965 25,973 700 ms
NestJS nestjs 3,271 3,510 13,143 128 ms
Nuxt nuxt 4,103 6,845 23,921 1.14 s
FastAPI fastapi 2,405 3,016 15,220 429 ms
Django django-postgresql 1,181 1,284 3,066 241 ms
Rails rails 1,945 2,770 10,552 140 ms
Laravel laravel 536 565 990 487 ms
Symfony symfony 640 697 1,893 413 ms

Peak requests per second across the 64 and 256 connection levels, measured with wrk. Each test has to pass the TechEmpower response checks first, or it's marked invalid.

WooCommerce

Page mix

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
8 virtual users
Home page 1.62 940 ms 1.15 s 1.19 s 0%
Shop page 1.62 1.18 s 1.35 s 1.38 s 0%
Category page 1.62 968 ms 1.27 s 1.32 s 0%
Product page 1.62 900 ms 1.1 s 1.12 s 0%
Product search 1.62 824 ms 916 ms 947 ms 0%
32 virtual users
Home page 1.82 3.53 s 3.94 s 4.01 s 0%
Shop page 1.82 4.63 s 5.22 s 5.35 s 0%
Category page 1.66 4.3 s 5.07 s 5.13 s 0%
Product page 1.36 3.56 s 3.72 s 3.76 s 0%
Product search 1.36 3.38 s 3.6 s 3.65 s 0%

Cart and checkout

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
8 virtual users
Add to cart 3.04 951 ms 1.06 s 1.08 s 0%
Cart 3.04 866 ms 953 ms 963 ms 0%
Checkout 3.04 725 ms 840 ms 868 ms 0%
32 virtual users
Add to cart 3.23 3.28 s 4.01 s 4.16 s 0%
Cart 3.23 3.64 s 3.93 s 4.03 s 0%
Checkout 3.23 2.85 s 3.28 s 3.4 s 0%

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 64 to 70 s per level. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200.

Discourse

Signed in

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
1 virtual user
Topic page 2.96 146 ms 209 ms 366 ms 0%
Topic JSON 1.48 71.3 ms 84.2 ms 110 ms 0%
Home page 1.48 131 ms 203 ms 349 ms 0%
Categories page 0.741 154 ms 347 ms 388 ms 0%
User activity page 0.741 91.5 ms 117 ms 191 ms 0%
4 virtual users
Topic page 2.57 669 ms 785 ms 1.65 s 0%
Topic JSON 1.3 353 ms 410 ms 479 ms 0%
Home page 1.29 609 ms 1.49 s 1.75 s 0%
Categories page 0.676 700 ms 1.02 s 1.57 s 0%
User activity page 0.659 404 ms 582 ms 1.02 s 0%
16 virtual users
Topic page 2.3 1.76 s 2.15 s 2.48 s 0%
Topic JSON 1.15 1.41 s 1.89 s 2.15 s 0%
Home page 1.12 1.75 s 2.51 s 3.16 s 0%
Categories page 0.575 1.85 s 2.15 s 2.96 s 0%
User activity page 0.575 1.54 s 2 s 2.15 s 0%

Anonymous

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
16 virtual users
Topic page 49.5 88.4 ms 221 ms 296 ms 0%
Topic JSON 24.8 84.3 ms 210 ms 302 ms 0%
Home page 24.7 87.1 ms 220 ms 295 ms 0%
Categories page 12.4 89.4 ms 231 ms 373 ms 0%
User activity page 12.4 279 ms 441 ms 804 ms 0%

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 to 63 s per level, after a 21 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Discourse ran with 4 app workers and 256 MB of Postgres shared buffers, what its installer picks for a 2 GB box. It had swap the way its installer sets a box up and used up to 440 MB of it. The container peaked at 1,468 MB.

Ghost

Readers

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
1 virtual user
Home page 10.6 24.8 ms 34.4 ms 70.1 ms 0%
Post page 26.4 13.5 ms 20.6 ms 41.9 ms 0%
Tag page 5.3 18.1 ms 24.5 ms 45.3 ms 0%
Author page 5.28 17.9 ms 22.8 ms 31.6 ms 0%
RSS feed 5.28 22.4 ms 31.2 ms 45.3 ms 0%
4 virtual users
Home page 11.1 88.9 ms 123 ms 186 ms 0%
Post page 27.6 65.8 ms 96 ms 174 ms 0%
Tag page 5.53 58.4 ms 85.4 ms 158 ms 0%
Author page 5.54 58.4 ms 81.5 ms 150 ms 0%
RSS feed 5.51 64.6 ms 98.5 ms 156 ms 0%
16 virtual users
Home page 10.6 369 ms 492 ms 511 ms 0%
Post page 26.4 311 ms 432 ms 461 ms 0%
Tag page 5.25 198 ms 310 ms 337 ms 0%
Author page 5.28 193 ms 285 ms 306 ms 0%
RSS feed 5.27 209 ms 308 ms 331 ms 0%

Staff in Ghost Admin

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
1 virtual user
Post list 5.34 28.1 ms 46.4 ms 76.7 ms 0%
Post editor 16.1 10.9 ms 17.3 ms 23.4 ms 0%
Saving a draft 16 25.6 ms 37.2 ms 63.3 ms 0%
Member list 5.35 30.3 ms 42.4 ms 65 ms 0%
4 virtual users
Post list 5.5 40 ms 51.5 ms 115 ms 0%
Post editor 16.6 22 ms 33.2 ms 57 ms 0%
Saving a draft 16.6 180 ms 249 ms 312 ms 0%
Member list 5.52 48.6 ms 62 ms 105 ms 0%

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 s per level, after a 20 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Ghost ran the way its ghost-docker setup runs it: one Node process, and MySQL with its stock 128 MB buffer pool. Memory peaked with Ghost at 358 MB and MySQL at 579 MB.

Wagtail

Visitors

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
1 virtual user
Home page 2.36 55.7 ms 60 ms 66.6 ms 0%
Blog index 2.36 195 ms 203 ms 208 ms 0%
Blog post 7.04 17.7 ms 27.2 ms 30 ms 0%
Bread page 7.06 19.5 ms 21.8 ms 24.9 ms 0%
Location page 2.36 18.5 ms 20.5 ms 25 ms 0%
Site search 2.34 28.9 ms 49.9 ms 51.2 ms 0%
4 virtual users
Home page 2.21 255 ms 291 ms 336 ms 0%
Blog index 2.26 845 ms 912 ms 1.09 s 0%
Blog post 6.65 72.3 ms 112 ms 131 ms 0%
Bread page 6.69 79.8 ms 98.1 ms 118 ms 0%
Location page 2.26 76 ms 91.1 ms 96.2 ms 0%
Site search 2.22 114 ms 208 ms 229 ms 0%
16 virtual users
Home page 2.13 869 ms 1.19 s 1.46 s 0%
Blog index 2.23 2.09 s 2.59 s 2.73 s 0%
Blog post 6.42 480 ms 863 ms 1.04 s 0%
Bread page 6.45 487 ms 835 ms 1.09 s 0%
Location page 2.18 472 ms 884 ms 1.06 s 0%
Site search 2.12 574 ms 945 ms 1.03 s 0%

Editors in the Wagtail admin

Step Requests/s Median p95 p99 Error rate
1 virtual user
Admin dashboard 0.962 57.5 ms 62.8 ms 72.5 ms 0%
Page explorer 1.96 247 ms 260 ms 375 ms 0%
Page editor 2.94 117 ms 147 ms 227 ms 0%
Image library 0.978 45.2 ms 48.7 ms 298 ms 0%
Admin page search 0.978 23.1 ms 51.3 ms 51.9 ms 0%
4 virtual users
Admin dashboard 0.876 317 ms 453 ms 590 ms 0%
Page explorer 1.77 1.14 s 1.43 s 1.47 s 0%
Page editor 2.69 538 ms 731 ms 892 ms 0%
Image library 0.892 270 ms 450 ms 464 ms 0%
Admin page search 0.876 120 ms 288 ms 388 ms 0%

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 to 61 s per level, after a 20 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Wagtail ran the way bakerydemo ships it: uWSGI with 2 workers of 4 threads each, whatever the box, and Postgres and Redis on stock settings. Memory peaked with Wagtail at 296 MB, Postgres at 181 MB, and Redis at 26 MB.

Advertised vs. measured

Spec Advertised Measured
vCPU 1 1
CPU Dedicated vCPU 0% of busy CPU time stolen
RAM 2 GB 1.9 GiB
Storage 25 GB NVMe 23.4 GiB
Architecture x86_64 x86_64
Virtualization KVM MICROSOFT

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

Detected hardware

CPU model
AMD EPYC-Milan Processor
CPU cores
1
CPU frequency
3250 MHz
AES-NI
Yes
VM-x/AMD-V
No
RAM reported
1.9 GiB
Swap reported
2.3 GiB
Disk reported
23.4 GiB
Virtualization reported
MICROSOFT
CPU steal
0% of busy CPU time stolen
Distro
Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS
Kernel
6.8.0-146-generic
Architecture
x86_64
IPv4 reachable
Yes
IPv6 reachable
Yes

Advertised at test time

Plan
CPU Optimized AMD 1 vCPU / 2 GB
Product line
Optimized Cloud CPU
Location
Los Angeles, US
vCPU
1 dedicated vCPU
Architecture
x86_64
RAM
2 GB
Storage
25 GB NVMe
Virtualization
KVM
Network
Unknown
Transfer
4.1 TB
Port 25
On request
Monthly price at test time
$28.00
Hourly price at test time
$0.038
YABS version
v2026-09-20
Ran at
Oct 11, 2026, 18:40:51 UTC
Parser version
5

Run timeline

Queued
Oct 11, 2026, 18:37:00 UTC
Server created
Oct 11, 2026, 18:38:09 UTC
First update from the server
Oct 11, 2026, 18:38:09 UTC
Completed
Oct 11, 2026, 20:08:47 UTC
Server deleted
Oct 11, 2026, 20:08:47 UTC
Cost of this run
$0.058
Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at . It's read only now.

Watch party

Loading the party