# RamNode 2GB Premium

[Atlanta, GA](https://rackcensus.com/locations/atlanta-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Atlanta")

Benchmark complete

Finished Oct 24, 2026

Geekbench 7 single-core

1,012

Faster than 44% of 2 vCPU plans

Geekbench 7 multi-core

Skipped

Disk 4K IOPS

10,736

fio random read and write, 50/50

Monthly price at test time

$14.00

Same price today

## Server

[RamNode](https://rackcensus.com/vps-providers/ramnode-benchmarks)[2GB Premium](https://rackcensus.com/plans/jmtbl0-ramnode-2gb-premium-benchmarks?location=ATL)

-

Provider

RamNode

-

Plan

2GB Premium

-

Location

Atlanta, GA

-

vCPU

2

-

RAM

2 GB

-

Storage

80 GB NVMe

-

Network

Unknown

-

OS image

Ubuntu 24.04 Server Cloud

-

Trigger

Scheduled

-

Queued at

Oct 22, 2026, 01:24:00 UTC

[Visit RamNode](https://rackcensus.com/go/ramnode)

## Latest runs of this plan

- [Piscataway, NJ Oct 21, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/xkp3kt-ramnode-2gb-premium-ewr-benchmark)138

[Full history of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/plans/jmtbl0-ramnode-2gb-premium-benchmarks/history)

## CPU

| Version | Single-core | Multi-core | Result link |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Geekbench 7 | 1,012 | Skipped | [Geekbench Browser](https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/705230) |

Multi-core was skipped because Geekbench 7 needs about 3.1 GB of free memory to run 2 threads, and this server didn't have that much. Single-core needs much less, so it still ran.

Scores from different Geekbench versions aren't comparable with each other. Charts only use Geekbench 7.

### Geekbench 7 workloads

| Workload | Single-core | Multi-core |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File Compression | 1,12037th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Navigation | 1,38323rd of 75 | Single-core only |
| HTML5 Browser | 67162nd of 75 | Single-core only |
| PDF Viewer | 1,17437th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Photo Library | 91739th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Clang | 85253rd of 75 | Single-core only |
| Text Processing | 45967th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Asset Compression | 1,18228th of 75 | Single-core only |
| HDR | 1,09126th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Photo Editor | 1,40223rd of 75 | Single-core only |
| Ray Tracer | 1,02748th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Structure from Motion | 1,26734th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Game Physics | 95548th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Video Encoder | 1,00742nd of 75 | Single-core only |
| Audio Encoder | 1,15739th of 75 | Single-core only |
| Video Player | 1,04944th of 75 | Single-core only |

Rank among the 75 runs with Geekbench 7 workload scores. Bars are relative to the best run. Geekbench doesn't run every workload multi-core, so some rows only have a single-core score.

## Disk

| Block size | Read | Write | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4K | 21 MB/s (5,365 IOPS) | 21 MB/s (5,371 IOPS) | 41.9 MB/s (10,736 IOPS) |
| 64K | 101.7 MB/s (1,627 IOPS) | 102.3 MB/s (1,636 IOPS) | 204 MB/s (3,263 IOPS) |
| 512K | 353 MB/s (706 IOPS) | 371.8 MB/s (743 IOPS) | 724.8 MB/s (1,449 IOPS) |
| 1M | 611.5 MB/s (611 IOPS) | 652.3 MB/s (652 IOPS) | 1.23 GB/s (1,263 IOPS) |

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

## Network

### IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...

| Target | Protocol | Send | Receive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Leaseweb, NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv4 | 56.3 Mbps | 672 Mbps |
| Eranium, Amsterdam, NL (100G) | IPv4 | 860 Mbps | 783 Mbps |
| Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) | IPv4 | busy | 606 Mbps |

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

## Application workloads

### PostgreSQL transactions
Measured

Durable transfers and indexed account lookups against a fixed relational dataset.

PostgreSQL transactions measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | transactions/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 99.67 | 47.45 / 1689.7 | 0 / 60 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 500 | 488.74 | 127.48 / 453.62 | 0 / 2016 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 1000 | 971.97 | 151.16 / 329.64 | 0 / 5000 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 3000 | 1932.28 | 246.77 / 339.66 | 0 / 191968 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 100 | 99.41 | 53.6 / 2103.44 | 0 / 105 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 500 | 489.88 | 97.21 / 394.5 | 0 / 1816 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 1000 | 970.64 | 154.22 / 336.29 | 0 / 5246 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 3000 | 2140.08 | 216.7 / 292.43 | 0 / 154503 | load generator fell behind |

p95 ≤ 50 ms · p99 ≤ 100 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### PostgreSQL large dataset
Failed

The same transaction mix against ten million accounts; the dataset never shrinks to fit a plan.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 100 ms · p99 ≤ 250 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis cache
Measured

A mixed cache workload with 1 KiB values, expiration, misses and eviction.

Redis cache measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | operations/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1000 | 999.91 | 22.67 / 54.7 | 0 / 14 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 5000 | 4458.86 | 74.82 / 120.03 | 0 / 97321 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 10000 | 6225.38 | 69.72 / 109.66 | 0 / 678937 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 25000 | 7157.39 | 71.86 / 113.02 | 0 / 3210380 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 1000 | 999.45 | 23.63 / 44.19 | 0 / 95 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5000 | 4474.08 | 71.86 / 120.03 | 0 / 94470 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 10000 | 6275.83 | 67.64 / 102.22 | 0 / 670221 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 25000 | 6268.39 | 83.59 / 127.48 | 0 / 3371558 | load generator fell behind |

p95 ≤ 10 ms · p99 ≤ 25 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis persistent queue
Measured

Enqueue, consume and acknowledge payloads with append-only persistence.

Redis persistent queue measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | jobs/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 58.72 / 87.91 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 500 | 495.4 | 143.77 / 476.81 | 0 / 827 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 1000 | 980.81 | 204.09 / 375.3 | 0 / 3439 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 3000 | 1725.45 | 232.41 / 323.13 | 0 / 229254 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 100 | 99.98 | 53.06 / 98.19 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 500 | 498.6 | 194.13 / 431.55 | 0 / 246 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 1000 | 954.52 | 298.33 / 496.21 | 0 / 8099 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 3000 | 1708.02 | 237.1 / 339.66 | 0 / 232363 | load generator fell behind |

p95 ≤ 20 ms · p99 ≤ 50 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Discourse community
Failed

Signed-in reading, search, posting and replies in a populated Rails forum.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 1500 ms · p99 ≤ 3000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n workflows
Measured

Webhook, transformation, branching and a verified final response.

n8n workflows measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 56.39 / 77.12 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 20 | 56.39 / 833.16 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 50 | 2.72 | 7013.92 / 7084.07 | 6182 / 2309 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 1.8 | 7013.92 / 7084.07 | 6411 / 11253 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 52.52 / 68.33 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 53.06 / 168.76 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 50 | 4.63 | 7013.92 / 7084.07 | 5887 / 2248 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 2.2 | 7013.92 / 7084.07 | 6345 / 11244 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n queue workers
Measured

Completed queued workflows including waiting time and worker execution.

n8n queue workers measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 63.02 / 158.92 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 20 | 61.76 / 98.19 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 50 | 43.07 | 6477.16 / 6673.45 | 9 / 1029 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 40.9 | 7084.07 / 8062.47 | 0 / 10425 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 55.82 / 81.1 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 65.62 / 283.8 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 50 | 42.97 | 6413.02 / 6541.94 | 0 / 1054 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 42 | 6673.45 / 6807.61 | 0 / 10223 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Ghost publishing
Measured

Readers, authenticated draft creation, publishing and image uploads.

Ghost publishing measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | journeys/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 532.07 / 643.01 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 19.97 | 1112.19 / 1672.96 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 50 | 32.49 | 7013.92 / 7084.07 | 1043 / 1907 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 28.12 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 1920 / 10829 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 576.24 / 717.5 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 19.94 | 1006.75 / 1317.35 | 0 / 0 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 50 | 31.09 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 1213 / 2002 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 22.22 | 7013.92 / 7013.92 | 2979 / 10884 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Formbricks / Next.js
Insufficient RAM

Public survey rendering, persisted responses and authenticated analysis.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Elasticsearch search and ingestion
Insufficient RAM

Full-text search, filtering and aggregations while new documents are indexed.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 250 ms · p99 ≤ 500 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### GitHub self-hosted runner
Insufficient RAM

A pinned build and test workflow with separate cold and warm dependency caches.

Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 3600000 ms · p99 ≤ 3600000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Odoo Community sales
Insufficient RAM

Customer lookup, sales order confirmation, stock operations and reporting.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

## Advertised vs. measured

| Spec | Advertised | Measured |
| --- | --- | --- |
| vCPU | 2 | 2 |
| CPU | Shared vCPU | 2.1% of busy CPU time stolen |
| RAM | 2 GB | 1.9 GiB |
| Storage | 80 GB NVMe | 77.4 GiB |
| Architecture | x86\_64 | x86\_64 |
| Virtualization | KVM | KVM |

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

## Detected hardware

**CPU model:** Intel Core Processor (Skylake, IBRS)

**CPU cores:** 2

**CPU frequency:** 3696 MHz

**AES-NI:** Yes

**VM-x/AMD-V:** Yes

**RAM reported:** 1.9 GiB

**Swap reported:** 0 MiB

**Disk reported:** 77.4 GiB

**Virtualization reported:** KVM

**CPU steal:** 2.1% of busy CPU time stolen

**Distro:** Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS

**Kernel:** 6.8.0-51-generic

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**IPv4 reachable:** Yes

**IPv6 reachable:** Yes

## Advertised at test time

**Plan:** 2GB Premium

**Product line:** Premium VPS

**Location:** Atlanta, GA

**vCPU:** 2 shared vCPU

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**RAM:** 2 GB

**Storage:** 80 GB NVMe

**Virtualization:** KVM

**Network:** Unknown

**Transfer:** 6 TB

**Port 25:** Unknown

**Monthly price at test time:** $14.00

**Hourly price at test time:** $0.021

**YABS version:** v2026-09-20

**Ran at:** Oct 24, 2026, 01:25:48 UTC

**Parser version:** 5

## Run timeline

**Queued:** Oct 22, 2026, 01:24:00 UTC

**First update from the server:** Oct 24, 2026, 01:24:45 UTC

**Completed:** Oct 24, 2026, 05:10:00 UTC

**Server deleted:** Oct 24, 2026, 05:10:00 UTC

**Cost of this run:** $0.079

Tests 37 of 39 done Live output 1093 lines

Setup 2 cores, 1.9 GiB RAM 4 of 4Done

Disk (fio) 44.0 MB/s at 4k, 1.32 GB/s at 1m 5 of 5Done

Network, IPv4 (iperf3) Median 458 Mbit/s send, 672 Mbit/s receive, 2 retried 3 of 3Done

Geekbench 7, single-core Score 1,012 18 of 18Done

Web apps 2 failed, 4 skipped 6 of 8Some failed

TestResultTime

PostgreSQL transactions 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 30m 18s

PostgreSQL large dataset RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 2m 35s

Redis cache 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 40s

Redis persistent queue 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 29s

Discourse community RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 19m 07s

n8n workflows 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 32m 37s

n8n queue workers 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 32m 45s

Ghost publishing 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 39m 48s

Formbricks / Next.js Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Elasticsearch search and ingestion Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

GitHub self-hosted runner Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Odoo Community sales Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Finish Results saved 1 of 1Done

Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at 06:10 UTC. It's read only now.

## Watch party

Loading the party