# Vultr High Performance AMD 1 vCPU / 1 GB

[Los Angeles, US](https://rackcensus.com/locations/los-angeles-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Los Angeles")

Benchmark complete

Finished Oct 8, 2026

Geekbench 7 single-core

Skipped

Geekbench 7 multi-core

Skipped

Disk 4K IOPS

87,658

fio random read and write, 50/50

Monthly price at test time

$6.00

Same price today

## Server

[Vultr](https://rackcensus.com/vps-providers/vultr-benchmarks)[High Performance AMD 1 vCPU / 1 GB](https://rackcensus.com/plans/nn8mia-vultr-high-performance-amd-1-vcpu-1-gb-benchmarks?location=lax)

-

Provider

Vultr

-

Plan

High Performance AMD 1 vCPU / 1 GB

-

Location

Los Angeles, US

-

vCPU

1

-

RAM

1 GB

-

Storage

25 GB NVMe

-

Network

Unknown

-

OS image

2284

-

Trigger

Scheduled

-

Queued at

Oct 7, 2026, 23:49:00 UTC

[Visit Vultr](https://rackcensus.com/go/vultr)

Referral link. If you sign up through it, I may get paid.

[Skip the referral](https://rackcensus.com/go/vultr/direct)[How this works](https://rackcensus.com/transparency#referrals-heading)

## Latest runs of this plan

- [New Jersey, US Oct 6, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/je98sz-vultr-high-performance-amd-1-vcpu-1-gb-ewr-benchmark)Skipped

[Full history of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/plans/nn8mia-vultr-high-performance-amd-1-vcpu-1-gb-benchmarks/history)

## CPU

Geekbench was skipped because this plan has less than 2 GB of RAM, which isn't enough for Geekbench 7 to run without swap.

## Memory, TLS and scheduler

### Memory bandwidth (STREAM)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Copy higher is better | 31.8 GB/s | 3 | 0.853% |
| Scale higher is better | 36 GB/s | 3 | 3.3% |
| Add higher is better | 32.1 GB/s | 3 | 2.24% |
| Triad higher is better | 31.5 GB/s | 3 | 2.75% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

### TLS and crypto (OpenSSL)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RSA 4096 signs higher is better | 734/s | 3 | 0.738% |
| RSA 4096 verifies higher is better | 12,724/s | 3 | 0.615% |
| SHA-256 higher is better | 1.12 GB/s | 3 | 0.475% |
| AES-256-GCM higher is better | 10.9 GB/s | 3 | 4.47% |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 higher is better | 4.16 GB/s | 3 | 0.136% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

### Scheduler latency (schbench)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Request latency, median lower is better | 3.65 ms | 3 | 0.79% |
| Requests per second, 90th percentile higher is better | 273/s | 3 | 0.211% |
| Request latency, 99.9th percentile lower is better | 7.14 ms | 3 | 8.41% |
| Requests per second, average higher is better | 270/s | 3 | 0.99% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

## Disk

| Block size | Read | Write | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4K | 171 MB/s (43,771 IOPS) | 171.4 MB/s (43,887 IOPS) | 342.4 MB/s (87,658 IOPS) |
| 64K | 1.17 GB/s (19,134 IOPS) | 1.17 GB/s (19,235 IOPS) | 2.34 GB/s (38,369 IOPS) |
| 512K | 1.46 GB/s (2,991 IOPS) | 1.54 GB/s (3,149 IOPS) | 3 GB/s (6,140 IOPS) |
| 1M | 1.56 GB/s (1,600 IOPS) | 1.67 GB/s (1,707 IOPS) | 3.23 GB/s (3,307 IOPS) |

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

## Network

### IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...

| Target | Protocol | Send | Receive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clouvider, London, UK (10G) | IPv4 | 1.18 Gbps | 1.6 Gbps |
| Eranium, Amsterdam, NL (100G) | IPv4 | 2.25 Gbps | 8.49 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) | IPv4 | 1.66 Gbps | 6.36 Gbps |
| Clouvider, Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | IPv4 | 8.75 Gbps | 8.01 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv4 | 3.94 Gbps | 8.75 Gbps |

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

## Datastores

### PostgreSQL

#### fsync speed (pg\_test\_fsync)

| Method | Operations per second | Time per operation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| One 8 kB write |
| --- |
| open\_datasync | 13,430 | 0.074 ms |
| fdatasync | 12,915 | 0.077 ms |
| fsync | 11,321 | 0.088 ms |
| fsync\_writethrough | Not supported here | n/a |
| open\_sync | 12,017 | 0.083 ms |
| Two 8 kB writes |
| --- |
| open\_datasync | 6,285 | 0.159 ms |
| fdatasync | 10,871 | 0.092 ms |
| fsync | 9,479 | 0.105 ms |
| fsync\_writethrough | Not supported here | n/a |
| open\_sync | 5,587 | 0.179 ms |
| open\_sync at different write sizes |
| --- |
| 1 \* 16kB open\_sync write | 10,319 | 0.097 ms |
| 2 \* 8kB open\_sync writes | 5,458 | 0.183 ms |
| 4 \* 4kB open\_sync writes | 2,840 | 0.352 ms |
| 8 \* 2kB open\_sync writes | 1,534 | 0.652 ms |
| 16 \* 1kB open\_sync writes | 778 | 1.29 ms |
| fsync on a non-write descriptor |
| --- |
| write, fsync, close | 9,962 | 0.1 ms |
| write, close, fsync | 9,625 | 0.104 ms |
| Non-synced 8 kB writes |
| --- |
| write | 593,654 | 0.002 ms |

pg\_test\_fsync against the Docker volume Postgres keeps its data on. fdatasync is Linux's default wal\_sync\_method.

#### pgbench at scale 10

| Workload | Clients | Transactions/s | Median | p95 | p99 | p99.9 | Failed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 1 | 3,327 | 0.289 ms | 0.346 ms | 0.493 ms | 1.37 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 8 | 3,857 | 1.94 ms | 2.99 ms | 3.88 ms | 5.88 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 32 | 3,542 | 7.59 ms | 17.7 ms | 27.9 ms | 46.2 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 40,539 | 0.023 ms | 0.032 ms | 0.038 ms | 0.072 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 39,499 | 0.172 ms | 0.282 ms | 0.348 ms | 0.626 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 38,771 | 0.708 ms | 1.23 ms | 1.37 ms | 2.03 ms | 0 |

Scale 10 (1,000,000 accounts), loaded in 1.21 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

#### pgbench at scale 100

| Workload | Clients | Transactions/s | Median | p95 | p99 | p99.9 | Failed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 1 | 1,961 | 0.514 ms | 0.633 ms | 1.34 ms | 2.03 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 8 | 2,743 | 2.67 ms | 4.18 ms | 5.93 ms | 24.9 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 32 | 3,023 | 9.9 ms | 14.8 ms | 18.4 ms | 23.4 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 4,456 | 0.248 ms | 0.319 ms | 0.725 ms | 1.44 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 13,307 | 0.564 ms | 0.935 ms | 1.74 ms | 2.57 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 14,118 | 1.83 ms | 2.91 ms | 4.1 ms | 5.37 ms | 0 |

Scale 100 (10,000,000 accounts), loaded in 12.5 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

### MySQL

#### sysbench OLTP

| Workload | Threads | Transactions/s | Queries/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Errors |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write | 1 | 606 | 12,128 | 1.52 ms | 2.26 ms | 4.18 ms | 0 |
| Read/write | 8 | 671 | 13,429 | 10.8 ms | 18.6 ms | 32.5 ms | 0 |
| Read/write | 32 | 720 | 14,400 | 39.7 ms | 81.5 ms | 113 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 1,517 | 24,270 | 0.63 ms | 0.797 ms | 1.16 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 1,415 | 22,633 | 5.57 ms | 6.43 ms | 7.3 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 1,313 | 21,006 | 24.4 ms | 28.2 ms | 30.3 ms | 0 |

10 tables of 100,000 rows, loaded in 8.8 s. 60 s per run, one connection per thread.

### Redis

#### memtier

| Mix | Operations/s | Hits/s | Median | p99 | p99.9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1:10 set:get | 41,309 | 37,553 | 1.53 ms | 2.91 ms | 3.82 ms |
| 1:1 set:get | 41,169 | 20,584 | 1.53 ms | 2.93 ms | 3.89 ms |

1,000,000 keys of 32 bytes. 64 connections over 1 thread, 60 s per ratio.

## Web frameworks

| Framework | Fortunes req/s | Single query req/s | JSON req/s | Fortunes p99 at 256 connections |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Next.js | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Express | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Fastify | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| NestJS | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Nuxt | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| FastAPI | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Django | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Rails | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Laravel | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |
| Symfony | The results arrived but couldn't be read, so no numbers are shown. |

### WooCommerce

#### Page mix

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.79 | 824 ms | 903 ms | 968 ms | 0% |
| Shop page | 1.79 | 1.06 s | 1.2 s | 1.23 s | 0% |
| Category page | 1.79 | 931 ms | 1.12 s | 1.16 s | 0% |
| Product page | 1.79 | 816 ms | 907 ms | 953 ms | 0% |
| Product search | 1.79 | 775 ms | 845 ms | 886 ms | 0% |
| 32 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.82 | 3.19 s | 3.53 s | 3.63 s | 0% |
| Shop page | 1.82 | 4.11 s | 4.61 s | 4.74 s | 0% |
| Category page | 1.82 | 3.85 s | 4.49 s | 4.62 s | 0% |
| Product page | 1.82 | 3.24 s | 3.4 s | 3.45 s | 0% |
| Product search | 1.79 | 3.09 s | 3.32 s | 3.38 s | 0% |

#### Cart and checkout

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8 virtual users |
| --- |
| Add to cart | 3.52 | 781 ms | 931 ms | 953 ms | 0% |
| Cart | 3.52 | 821 ms | 896 ms | 915 ms | 0% |
| Checkout | 3.52 | 653 ms | 735 ms | 763 ms | 0% |
| 32 virtual users |
| --- |
| Add to cart | 3.58 | 2.92 s | 3.58 s | 3.66 s | 0% |
| Cart | 3.58 | 3.31 s | 3.58 s | 3.63 s | 0% |
| Checkout | 3.58 | 2.6 s | 2.94 s | 3.01 s | 0% |

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 61 to 70 s per level. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200.

## Advertised vs. measured

| Spec | Advertised | Measured |
| --- | --- | --- |
| vCPU | 1 | 1 |
| CPU | Shared vCPU | 0% of busy CPU time stolen |
| RAM | 1 GB | 955 MiB |
| Storage | 25 GB NVMe | 23.4 GiB |
| Architecture | x86\_64 | x86\_64 |
| Virtualization | KVM | MICROSOFT |

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

## Detected hardware

**CPU model:** AMD EPYC-Genoa Processor

**CPU cores:** 1

**CPU frequency:** 2900 MHz

**AES-NI:** Yes

**VM-x/AMD-V:** No

**RAM reported:** 955 MiB

**Swap reported:** 2.3 GiB

**Disk reported:** 23.4 GiB

**Virtualization reported:** MICROSOFT

**CPU steal:** 0% of busy CPU time stolen

**Distro:** Ubuntu 24.04.5 LTS

**Kernel:** 6.8.0-146-generic

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**IPv4 reachable:** Yes

**IPv6 reachable:** Yes

## Advertised at test time

**Plan:** High Performance AMD 1 vCPU / 1 GB

**Product line:** Cloud Compute High Performance

**Location:** Los Angeles, US

**vCPU:** 1 shared vCPU

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**RAM:** 1 GB

**Storage:** 25 GB NVMe

**Virtualization:** KVM

**Network:** Unknown

**Transfer:** 2.05 TB

**Port 25:** On request

**Monthly price at test time:** $6.00

**Hourly price at test time:** $0.0080

**YABS version:** v2026-09-20

**Ran at:** Oct 7, 2026, 23:51:45 UTC

**Parser version:** 5

## Run timeline

**Queued:** Oct 7, 2026, 23:49:00 UTC

**Server created:** Oct 7, 2026, 23:49:58 UTC

**First update from the server:** Oct 7, 2026, 23:49:58 UTC

**Completed:** Oct 8, 2026, 00:57:12 UTC

**Server deleted:** Oct 8, 2026, 00:57:12 UTC

**Cost of this run:** $0.0091

Tests 35 of 35 done Live output 716 lines

Setup 1 cores, 954.7 MiB RAM 4 of 4Done

Disk (fio) 359 MB/s at 4k, 3.46 GB/s at 1m 5 of 5Done

Network, IPv4 (iperf3) Median 2.25 Gbit/s send, 8.01 Gbit/s receive, 2 retried 5 of 5Done

Phoronix (memory, TLS, scheduler) 3 of 3Done

Datastores 5 of 5Done

Web frameworks 12 of 12Done

Finish Results saved 1 of 1Done

Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at 00:54 UTC. It's read only now.

## Watch party

Loading the party