# RamNode 2GB Premium

[Los Angeles, CA](https://rackcensus.com/locations/los-angeles-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Los Angeles")

Benchmark complete

Finished Oct 26, 2026

Geekbench 7 single-core

859

Faster than 26% of 2 vCPU plans

Geekbench 7 multi-core

Skipped

Disk 4K IOPS

92,263

fio random read and write, 50/50

Monthly price at test time

$14.00

Same price today

## Server

[RamNode](https://rackcensus.com/vps-providers/ramnode-benchmarks)[2GB Premium](https://rackcensus.com/plans/jmtbl0-ramnode-2gb-premium-benchmarks?location=LAX)

-

Provider

RamNode

-

Plan

2GB Premium

-

Location

Los Angeles, CA

-

vCPU

2

-

RAM

2 GB

-

Storage

80 GB NVMe

-

Network

Unknown

-

OS image

Ubuntu 24.04 Server Cloud

-

Trigger

Scheduled

-

Queued at

Oct 23, 2026, 11:19:00 UTC

[Visit RamNode](https://rackcensus.com/go/ramnode)

## Latest runs of this plan

- [Atlanta, GA Oct 24, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/dnw93m-ramnode-2gb-premium-atl-benchmark)1,012
- [Piscataway, NJ Oct 21, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/xkp3kt-ramnode-2gb-premium-ewr-benchmark)138

[Full history of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/plans/jmtbl0-ramnode-2gb-premium-benchmarks/history)

## CPU

| Version | Single-core | Multi-core | Result link |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Geekbench 7 | 859 | Skipped | [Geekbench Browser](https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/722355) |

Multi-core was skipped because Geekbench 7 needs about 3.1 GB of free memory to run 2 threads, and this server didn't have that much. Single-core needs much less, so it still ran.

Scores from different Geekbench versions aren't comparable with each other. Charts only use Geekbench 7.

### Geekbench 7 workloads

| Workload | Single-core | Multi-core |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File Compression | 98470th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Navigation | 1,08567th of 100 | Single-core only |
| HTML5 Browser | 68985th of 100 | Single-core only |
| PDF Viewer | 95675th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Photo Library | 75273rd of 100 | Single-core only |
| Clang | 81278th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Text Processing | 54990th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Asset Compression | 78476th of 100 | Single-core only |
| HDR | 84770th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Photo Editor | 1,08160th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Ray Tracer | 86580th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Structure from Motion | 1,02975th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Game Physics | 87975th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Video Encoder | 80076th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Audio Encoder | 99769th of 100 | Single-core only |
| Video Player | 83575th of 100 | Single-core only |

Rank among the 100 runs with Geekbench 7 workload scores. Bars are relative to the best run. Geekbench doesn't run every workload multi-core, so some rows only have a single-core score.

## Disk

| Block size | Read | Write | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4K | 180 MB/s (46,071 IOPS) | 180.4 MB/s (46,192 IOPS) | 360.4 MB/s (92,263 IOPS) |
| 64K | 353.5 MB/s (5,656 IOPS) | 355.4 MB/s (5,686 IOPS) | 708.9 MB/s (11,342 IOPS) |
| 512K | 279.1 MB/s (558 IOPS) | 294 MB/s (587 IOPS) | 573.1 MB/s (1,145 IOPS) |
| 1M | 400.3 MB/s (400 IOPS) | 427 MB/s (426 IOPS) | 827.3 MB/s (826 IOPS) |

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

## Network

### IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...

| Target | Protocol | Send | Receive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clouvider, Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | IPv4 | 8.79 Gbps | 3.91 Gbps |
| Clouvider, London, UK (10G) | IPv4 | 1.01 Gbps | 1.55 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) | IPv4 | 1.03 Gbps | 1.38 Gbps |

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

## Application workloads

### PostgreSQL transactions
Measured

Durable transfers and indexed account lookups against a fixed relational dataset.

PostgreSQL transactions measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | transactions/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 98.66 | 66.96 / 3460.03 | 0 / 241 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 500 | 477.29 | 386.71 / 792.67 | 73 / 3967 | load generator saturated |
| 1 | 1000 | 909.37 | 259.4 / 501.18 | 255 / 15949 | load generator saturated |
| 1 | 3000 | 2386.93 | 202.06 / 353.5 | 0 / 109457 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 100 | 98.31 | 127.48 / 4180.3 | 0 / 301 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 500 | 482.59 | 371.58 / 717.5 | 0 / 3079 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 1000 | 894.77 | 382.87 / 761.7 | 20 / 18876 | fixture correctness failed |
| 2 | 3000 | 1957.46 | 295.36 / 506.2 | 0 / 187461 | load generator saturated |

p95 ≤ 50 ms · p99 ≤ 100 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### PostgreSQL large dataset
Failed

The same transaction mix against ten million accounts; the dataset never shrinks to fit a plan.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 100 ms · p99 ≤ 250 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis cache
Measured

A mixed cache workload with 1 KiB values, expiration, misses and eviction.

Redis cache measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | operations/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 1000 | 998.1 | 67.64 / 173.9 | 0 / 299 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 5000 | 4287.25 | 95.27 / 196.08 | 0 / 127974 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 10000 | 6716.97 | 95.27 / 188.39 | 0 / 590878 | load generator saturated |
| 1 | 25000 | 7394.01 | 108.57 / 210.3 | 0 / 3168117 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 1000 | 992.24 | 103.25 / 267.29 | 0 / 1352 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 5000 | 4117.99 | 109.66 / 218.88 | 0 / 158028 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 10000 | 6504.99 | 101.2 / 212.41 | 0 / 628537 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 25000 | 8574.84 | 86.16 / 163.76 | 0 / 2956355 | load generator saturated |

p95 ≤ 10 ms · p99 ≤ 25 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Redis persistent queue
Measured

Enqueue, consume and acknowledge payloads with append-only persistence.

Redis persistent queue measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | jobs/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 100 | 100 | 97.21 / 186.52 | 0 / 0 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 500 | 481.91 | 564.87 / 1192.49 | 0 / 3255 | load generator saturated |
| 1 | 1000 | 933.72 | 332.95 / 576.24 | 0 / 11925 | load generator saturated |
| 1 | 3000 | 2085.88 | 249.24 / 427.27 | 0 / 164329 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 100 | 99.99 | 96.24 / 204.09 | 0 / 0 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 500 | 482.14 | 406.48 / 1240.95 | 0 / 3213 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 1000 | 891.49 | 423.03 / 746.68 | 0 / 19506 | load generator saturated |
| 2 | 3000 | 1960.09 | 275.42 / 440.25 | 0 / 186647 | load generator saturated |

p95 ≤ 20 ms · p99 ≤ 50 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Discourse community
Failed

Signed-in reading, search, posting and replies in a populated Rails forum.

RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError:

p95 ≤ 1500 ms · p99 ≤ 3000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n workflows
Measured

Webhook, transformation, branching and a verified final response.

n8n workflows measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 53.06 / 74.82 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 20 | 44.65 / 66.29 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 50 | 49.99 | 739.27 / 929.64 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 100 | 53.43 | 5469.01 / 5981.47 | 0 / 8243 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 56.96 / 79.49 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 46.03 / 85.29 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 50 | 50 | 319.92 / 630.32 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 100 | 53.92 | 5255.57 / 5361.23 | 0 / 8118 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### n8n queue workers
Measured

Completed queued workflows including waiting time and worker execution.

n8n queue workers measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | workflows/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 66.96 / 91.52 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 20 | 59.31 / 123.7 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 50 | 44.8 | 6349.51 / 6607.37 | 0 / 717 | latency limit exceeded |
| 1 | 100 | 44.09 | 6607.37 / 6875.7 | 0 / 9854 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 68.33 / 95.27 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 20 | 60.52 / 104.29 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 50 | 44.52 | 6224.38 / 6413.02 | 0 / 745 | latency limit exceeded |
| 2 | 100 | 45.4 | 6286.64 / 6607.37 | 0 / 9616 | latency limit exceeded |

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Ghost publishing
Measured

Readers, authenticated draft creation, publishing and image uploads.

Ghost publishing measurements| Repeat | Offered / s | journeys/s | p95 / p99 ms | Errors / dropped | Result |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 | 5 | 5 | 542.79 / 669.16 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 1 | 20 | 19.98 | 1426.59 / 2835.47 | 0 / 0 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 50 | 12.19 | 7084.07 / 7154.92 | 4430 / 2296 | load generator fell behind |
| 1 | 100 | 1.61 | 7084.07 / 7371.75 | 6434 / 11265 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 5 | 5 | 537.4 / 689.47 | 0 / 0 | Met workload limits |
| 2 | 20 | 19.96 | 1793.71 / 3898.97 | 1 / 0 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 50 | 2.89 | 7084.07 / 7154.92 | 6105 / 2359 | load generator fell behind |
| 2 | 100 | 6.94 | 7084.07 / 7154.92 | 5455 / 11249 | load generator fell behind |

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Formbricks / Next.js
Insufficient RAM

Public survey rendering, persisted responses and authenticated analysis.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 1000 ms · p99 ≤ 2000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Elasticsearch search and ingestion
Insufficient RAM

Full-text search, filtering and aggregations while new documents are indexed.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 250 ms · p99 ≤ 500 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### GitHub self-hosted runner
Insufficient RAM

A pinned build and test workflow with separate cold and warm dependency caches.

Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 3600000 ms · p99 ≤ 3600000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

### Odoo Community sales
Insufficient RAM

Customer lookup, sales order confirmation, stock operations and reporting.

Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

p95 ≤ 2000 ms · p99 ≤ 4000 ms · errors ≤ 1.0%

## Advertised vs. measured

| Spec | Advertised | Measured |
| --- | --- | --- |
| vCPU | 2 | 2 |
| CPU | Shared vCPU | 0.9% of busy CPU time stolen |
| RAM | 2 GB | 1.9 GiB |
| Storage | 80 GB NVMe | 77.4 GiB |
| Architecture | x86\_64 | x86\_64 |
| Virtualization | KVM | KVM |

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

## Detected hardware

**CPU model:** Intel Xeon Processor (Skylake, IBRS)

**CPU cores:** 2

**CPU frequency:** 3192 MHz

**AES-NI:** Yes

**VM-x/AMD-V:** Yes

**RAM reported:** 1.9 GiB

**Swap reported:** 0 MiB

**Disk reported:** 77.4 GiB

**Virtualization reported:** KVM

**CPU steal:** 0.9% of busy CPU time stolen

**Distro:** Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS

**Kernel:** 6.8.0-51-generic

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**IPv4 reachable:** Yes

**IPv6 reachable:** No

## Advertised at test time

**Plan:** 2GB Premium

**Product line:** Premium VPS

**Location:** Los Angeles, CA

**vCPU:** 2 shared vCPU

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**RAM:** 2 GB

**Storage:** 80 GB NVMe

**Virtualization:** KVM

**Network:** Unknown

**Transfer:** 6 TB

**Port 25:** Unknown

**Monthly price at test time:** $14.00

**Hourly price at test time:** $0.021

**YABS version:** v2026-09-20

**Ran at:** Oct 25, 2026, 23:44:02 UTC

**Parser version:** 5

## Run timeline

**Queued:** Oct 23, 2026, 11:19:00 UTC

**First update from the server:** Oct 25, 2026, 23:43:49 UTC

**Completed:** Oct 26, 2026, 03:25:00 UTC

**Server deleted:** Oct 26, 2026, 03:25:00 UTC

**Cost of this run:** $0.078

Tests 37 of 39 done Live output 1086 lines

Setup 2 cores, 1.9 GiB RAM 4 of 4Done

Disk (fio) 378 MB/s at 4k, 867 MB/s at 1m 5 of 5Done

Network, IPv4 (iperf3) Median 1.03 Gbit/s send, 1.55 Gbit/s receive, 1 retried 3 of 3Done

Geekbench 7, single-core Score 859 18 of 18Done

Web apps 2 failed, 4 skipped 6 of 8Some failed

TestResultTime

PostgreSQL transactions 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 30m 40s

PostgreSQL large dataset RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 2m 43s

Redis cache 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 43s

Redis persistent queue 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 28m 31s

Discourse community RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: Stopped RuntimeError: RuntimeError: TimeoutError: 19m 58s

n8n workflows 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 32m 14s

n8n queue workers 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 32m 59s

Ghost publishing 8 measured trials completed 8 trials Measurements, 8 measured trials completed 34m 44s

Formbricks / Next.js Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Elasticsearch search and ingestion Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

GitHub self-hosted runner Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 8192 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Odoo Community sales Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected. Not run Requires 4096 MiB RAM; plan has 2048 MiB, 1967 MiB detected.

Finish Results saved 1 of 1Done

Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at 04:25 UTC. It's read only now.

## Watch party

Loading the party