# Linode Dedicated 4GB

[Chicago, IL](https://rackcensus.com/locations/chicago-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Chicago")

Benchmark complete

Finished Oct 13, 2026

Geekbench 7 single-core

1,061

Faster than 57% of 2 vCPU plans

Geekbench 7 multi-core

1,377

Faster than 26% of 2 vCPU plans

Disk 4K IOPS

76,869

fio random read and write, 50/50

Monthly price at test time

$36.00

38 multi-core points per dollar

Same price today

## Server

[Linode](https://rackcensus.com/vps-providers/linode-benchmarks)[Dedicated 4GB](https://rackcensus.com/plans/8mq8an-linode-dedicated-4gb-benchmarks?location=us-ord)

-

Provider

Linode

-

Plan

Dedicated 4GB

-

Location

Chicago, IL

-

vCPU

2

-

RAM

4 GB

-

Storage

80 GB SSD

-

Network

4 Gbps

-

OS image

linode/ubuntu24.04

-

Trigger

Scheduled

-

Queued at

Oct 13, 2026, 12:24:00 UTC

[Visit Linode](https://rackcensus.com/go/linode)

Referral link. If you sign up through it, I may get paid. [How this works](https://rackcensus.com/transparency#referrals-heading)

## Latest runs of this plan

- [Newark, NJ Oct 13, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/4lw04q-linode-dedicated-4gb-us-east-benchmark)1,181
- [Amsterdam, NL Oct 9, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/p7r7c5-linode-dedicated-4gb-nl-ams-benchmark)1,307
- [Frankfurt, DE Oct 9, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/xlbns1-linode-dedicated-4gb-eu-central-benchmark)1,119
- [Fremont, CA Oct 7, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/zlywhw-linode-dedicated-4gb-us-west-benchmark)1,015
- [Newark, NJ Oct 6, 2026](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks/ulff3h-linode-dedicated-4gb-us-east-benchmark)1,250

[Full history of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/plans/8mq8an-linode-dedicated-4gb-benchmarks/history)

## CPU

| Version | Single-core | Multi-core | Result link |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Geekbench 7 | 1,061 | 1,377 | [Geekbench Browser](https://browser.geekbench.com/v7/cpu/621839) |

Scores from different Geekbench versions aren't comparable with each other. Charts only use Geekbench 7.

### Geekbench 7 workloads

| Workload | Single-core | Multi-core |
| --- | --- | --- |
| File Compression | 1,07794th of 151 | 1,34894th of 114 |
| Navigation | 980125th of 151 | Single-core only |
| HTML5 Browser | 1,03491st of 151 | Single-core only |
| PDF Viewer | 1,17087th of 151 | Single-core only |
| Photo Library | 94392nd of 151 | 1,19798th of 114 |
| Clang | 984101st of 151 | 1,319102nd of 114 |
| Text Processing | 903110th of 151 | 1,23899th of 114 |
| Asset Compression | 1,13991st of 151 | 1,53096th of 114 |
| HDR | 842107th of 151 | 1,17197th of 114 |
| Photo Editor | 793117th of 151 | 1,57987th of 114 |
| Ray Tracer | 1,25467th of 151 | 1,73593rd of 114 |
| Structure from Motion | 1,15195th of 151 | Single-core only |
| Game Physics | 1,13581st of 151 | Single-core only |
| Video Encoder | 1,11885th of 151 | Single-core only |
| Audio Encoder | 1,28771st of 151 | Single-core only |
| Video Player | 1,34569th of 151 | Single-core only |

Rank among the 151 runs with Geekbench 7 workload scores. Bars are relative to the best run. Geekbench doesn't run every workload multi-core, so some rows only have a single-core score.

## Memory, TLS and scheduler

### Memory bandwidth (STREAM)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Copy higher is better | 44.7 GB/s | 3 | 1.47% |
| Scale higher is better | 30 GB/s | 3 | 0.273% |
| Add higher is better | 32.3 GB/s | 3 | 0.72% |
| Triad higher is better | 32.2 GB/s | 3 | 0.464% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

### TLS and crypto (OpenSSL)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| RSA 4096 signs higher is better | 221/s | 3 | 0.333% |
| RSA 4096 verifies higher is better | 14,300/s | 3 | 1.06% |
| SHA-256 higher is better | 1.15 GB/s | 3 | 0.614% |
| AES-256-GCM higher is better | 3.64 GB/s | 3 | 0.137% |
| ChaCha20-Poly1305 higher is better | 2.53 GB/s | 3 | 0.379% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

### Scheduler latency (schbench)

| Test | Result | Runs | Spread |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Request latency, median lower is better | 10.4 ms | 3 | 1.1% |
| Requests per second, 90th percentile higher is better | 190/s | 3 | 1.21% |
| Request latency, 99.9th percentile lower is better | 18.3 ms | 3 | 3.16% |
| Requests per second, average higher is better | 190/s | 3 | 0.823% |

Average of 3 runs. Spread is the standard deviation as a share of the average.

## Disk

| Block size | Read | Write | Total |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 4K | 149.9 MB/s (38,384 IOPS) | 150.3 MB/s (38,485 IOPS) | 300.3 MB/s (76,869 IOPS) |
| 64K | 1.24 GB/s (20,299 IOPS) | 1.25 GB/s (20,406 IOPS) | 2.48 GB/s (40,705 IOPS) |
| 512K | 2.32 GB/s (4,750 IOPS) | 2.44 GB/s (5,002 IOPS) | 4.76 GB/s (9,752 IOPS) |
| 1M | 2.47 GB/s (2,531 IOPS) | 2.64 GB/s (2,699 IOPS) | 5.11 GB/s (5,230 IOPS) |

fio random read and write, 50/50, run by YABS against the boot disk.

## Network

### IPv4 transfer speed

Loading...

| Target | Protocol | Send | Receive |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Clouvider, London, UK (10G) | IPv4 | 1.94 Gbps | 2.1 Gbps |
| Eranium, Amsterdam, NL (100G) | IPv4 | 1.83 Gbps | 2.13 Gbps |
| Leaseweb, Singapore, SG (10G) | IPv4 | 559 Mbps | 981 Mbps |
| Clouvider, Los Angeles, CA, US (10G) | IPv4 | 1.96 Gbps | 963 Mbps |
| Leaseweb, NYC, NY, US (10G) | IPv4 | 3.82 Gbps | 9.27 Gbps |

Public iperf3 servers vary in capacity and availability. Compare a target only with itself over time.

## Datastores

### PostgreSQL

#### fsync speed (pg\_test\_fsync)

| Method | Operations per second | Time per operation |
| --- | --- | --- |
| One 8 kB write |
| --- |
| open\_datasync | 1,837 | 0.544 ms |
| fdatasync | 3,888 | 0.257 ms |
| fsync | 2,999 | 0.333 ms |
| fsync\_writethrough | Not supported here | n/a |
| open\_sync | 3,242 | 0.308 ms |
| Two 8 kB writes |
| --- |
| open\_datasync | 4,051 | 0.247 ms |
| fdatasync | 3,956 | 0.253 ms |
| fsync | 2,695 | 0.371 ms |
| fsync\_writethrough | Not supported here | n/a |
| open\_sync | 1,619 | 0.618 ms |
| open\_sync at different write sizes |
| --- |
| 1 \* 16kB open\_sync write | 3,233 | 0.309 ms |
| 2 \* 8kB open\_sync writes | 1,619 | 0.618 ms |
| 4 \* 4kB open\_sync writes | 194 | 5.16 ms |
| 8 \* 2kB open\_sync writes | 180 | 5.56 ms |
| 16 \* 1kB open\_sync writes | 132 | 7.58 ms |
| fsync on a non-write descriptor |
| --- |
| write, fsync, close | 2,841 | 0.352 ms |
| write, close, fsync | 2,827 | 0.354 ms |
| Non-synced 8 kB writes |
| --- |
| write | 356,699 | 0.003 ms |

pg\_test\_fsync against the Docker volume Postgres keeps its data on. fdatasync is Linux's default wal\_sync\_method.

#### pgbench at scale 10

| Workload | Clients | Transactions/s | Median | p95 | p99 | p99.9 | Failed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 1 | 1,020 | 0.904 ms | 1.38 ms | 1.73 ms | 3.65 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 8 | 2,664 | 2.69 ms | 5.16 ms | 7.75 ms | 13.6 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 32 | 2,777 | 8.97 ms | 27.2 ms | 45.3 ms | 81.3 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 12,236 | 0.075 ms | 0.103 ms | 0.255 ms | 0.305 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 31,000 | 0.224 ms | 0.396 ms | 0.566 ms | 1.34 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 31,325 | 0.821 ms | 1.37 ms | 1.99 ms | 3.53 ms | 0 |

Scale 10 (1,000,000 accounts), loaded in 2 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

#### pgbench at scale 100

| Workload | Clients | Transactions/s | Median | p95 | p99 | p99.9 | Failed |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 1 | 948 | 0.959 ms | 1.54 ms | 2 ms | 3.43 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 8 | 2,592 | 2.94 ms | 4.74 ms | 6.38 ms | 10.2 ms | 0 |
| Read/write (TPC-B like) | 32 | 3,027 | 9.94 ms | 16.2 ms | 21.7 ms | 35.7 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 8,362 | 0.098 ms | 0.222 ms | 0.48 ms | 1.19 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 24,459 | 0.285 ms | 0.525 ms | 0.91 ms | 2.19 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 24,986 | 1.08 ms | 1.78 ms | 2.63 ms | 4.56 ms | 0 |

Scale 100 (10,000,000 accounts), loaded in 20.5 s. 60 s per run, prepared statements. Latency comes from sampled transaction logs, and p99.9 is left out when fewer than 1,000 were sampled.

### MySQL

#### sysbench OLTP

| Workload | Threads | Transactions/s | Queries/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Errors |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Read/write | 1 | 213 | 4,255 | 4.18 ms | 7.7 ms | 11.7 ms | 0 |
| Read/write | 8 | 467 | 9,347 | 17.3 ms | 26.2 ms | 33.7 ms | 0 |
| Read/write | 32 | 515 | 10,305 | 61.1 ms | 101 ms | 130 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 1 | 478 | 7,654 | 1.96 ms | 2.57 ms | 3.08 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 8 | 947 | 15,160 | 8.13 ms | 11.7 ms | 13.7 ms | 0 |
| Read only | 32 | 927 | 14,828 | 33.7 ms | 44.2 ms | 50.1 ms | 0 |

10 tables of 100,000 rows, loaded in 11.6 s. 60 s per run, one connection per thread.

### Redis

#### memtier

| Mix | Operations/s | Hits/s | Median | p99 | p99.9 |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1:10 set:get | 35,693 | 32,448 | 1.54 ms | 4.48 ms | 6.3 ms |
| 1:1 set:get | 34,609 | 17,304 | 1.6 ms | 4.54 ms | 6.78 ms |

1,000,000 keys of 32 bytes. 64 connections over 2 threads, 60 s per ratio.

## Web frameworks

| Framework | Fortunes req/s | Single query req/s | JSON req/s | Fortunes p99 at 256 connections |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Next.js nextjs | 368 | 1,329 | 1,771 | 1.01 s |
| Express express-postgresjs | 4,488 | 6,215 | 14,213 | 288 ms |
| Fastify fastify-postgres | 4,389 | 6,536 | 14,905 | 107 ms |
| NestJS nestjs | 2,604 | 2,943 | 8,331 | 152 ms |
| Nuxt nuxt | 3,891 | 5,578 | 12,573 | 122 ms |
| FastAPI fastapi | 2,077 | 2,599 | 8,338 | 618 ms |
| Django django-postgresql | 1,043 | 1,197 | 2,480 | 320 ms |
| Rails rails | 1,771 | 2,402 | 7,710 | 202 ms |
| Laravel laravel | 460 | 493 | 884 | 592 ms |
| Symfony symfony | 602 | 656 | 1,693 | 453 ms |

Peak requests per second across the 64 and 256 connection levels, measured with wrk. Each test has to pass the TechEmpower response checks first, or it's marked invalid.

### WooCommerce

#### Page mix

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.29 | 1.23 s | 1.39 s | 1.42 s | 0% |
| Shop page | 1.29 | 1.66 s | 1.83 s | 1.93 s | 0% |
| Category page | 1.29 | 1.05 s | 1.62 s | 1.7 s | 0% |
| Product page | 1.29 | 1.11 s | 1.29 s | 1.37 s | 0% |
| Product search | 1.29 | 1 s | 1.18 s | 1.21 s | 0% |
| 32 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.36 | 4.44 s | 5.05 s | 5.19 s | 0% |
| Shop page | 1.36 | 5.89 s | 6.67 s | 6.71 s | 0% |
| Category page | 1.36 | 5.17 s | 6.17 s | 6.45 s | 0% |
| Product page | 1.36 | 4.45 s | 4.72 s | 4.85 s | 0% |
| Product search | 1 | 4.12 s | 4.48 s | 4.53 s | 0% |

#### Cart and checkout

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 8 virtual users |
| --- |
| Add to cart | 2.44 | 1.32 s | 1.57 s | 1.58 s | 0% |
| Cart | 2.44 | 1.09 s | 1.28 s | 1.32 s | 0% |
| Checkout | 2.44 | 837 ms | 991 ms | 1.03 s | 0% |
| 32 virtual users |
| --- |
| Add to cart | 2.46 | 4.39 s | 5.35 s | 5.56 s | 0% |
| Cart | 2.46 | 4.69 s | 5.09 s | 5.24 s | 0% |
| Checkout | 2.46 | 3.72 s | 4.29 s | 4.36 s | 0% |

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 63 to 71 s per level. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200.

### Discourse

#### Signed in

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 virtual user |
| --- |
| Topic page | 1.68 | 257 ms | 346 ms | 547 ms | 0% |
| Topic JSON | 0.858 | 133 ms | 224 ms | 296 ms | 0% |
| Home page | 0.841 | 231 ms | 390 ms | 493 ms | 0% |
| Categories page | 0.429 | 264 ms | 362 ms | 520 ms | 0% |
| User activity page | 0.412 | 166 ms | 220 ms | 340 ms | 0% |
| 4 virtual users |
| --- |
| Topic page | 2.28 | 770 ms | 1.09 s | 1.65 s | 0% |
| Topic JSON | 1.15 | 401 ms | 531 ms | 602 ms | 0% |
| Home page | 1.14 | 675 ms | 1.08 s | 1.22 s | 0% |
| Categories page | 0.594 | 801 ms | 1.4 s | 1.88 s | 0% |
| User activity page | 0.577 | 460 ms | 632 ms | 905 ms | 0% |
| 16 virtual users |
| --- |
| Topic page | 2.32 | 1.95 s | 2.34 s | 2.83 s | 0% |
| Topic JSON | 1.13 | 1.53 s | 1.85 s | 2.07 s | 0% |
| Home page | 1.1 | 1.84 s | 2.3 s | 2.49 s | 0% |
| Categories page | 0.623 | 1.99 s | 2.35 s | 3.03 s | 0% |
| User activity page | 0.543 | 1.6 s | 1.89 s | 2 s | 0% |

#### Anonymous

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 16 virtual users |
| --- |
| Topic page | 52.8 | 82.8 ms | 205 ms | 284 ms | 0% |
| Topic JSON | 26.4 | 80.7 ms | 201 ms | 289 ms | 0% |
| Home page | 26.4 | 83.6 ms | 203 ms | 251 ms | 0% |
| Categories page | 13.2 | 87.3 ms | 208 ms | 279 ms | 0% |
| User activity page | 13.2 | 271 ms | 397 ms | 607 ms | 0% |

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 to 63 s per level, after a 22 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Discourse ran with 4 app workers and 1024 MB of Postgres shared buffers, what its installer picks for a 4 GB box. It added a 2 GB swapfile first, the way its installer does, and didn't need it. The container peaked at 2,401 MB.

### Ghost

#### Readers

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 virtual user |
| --- |
| Home page | 6.96 | 39.4 ms | 48.6 ms | 62 ms | 0% |
| Post page | 17.4 | 21.1 ms | 27.9 ms | 38.3 ms | 0% |
| Tag page | 3.48 | 27.6 ms | 33.4 ms | 76.6 ms | 0% |
| Author page | 3.48 | 27.7 ms | 33 ms | 39.6 ms | 0% |
| RSS feed | 3.48 | 34.1 ms | 40.5 ms | 51.6 ms | 0% |
| 4 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 7.94 | 127 ms | 162 ms | 240 ms | 0% |
| Post page | 19.8 | 93.9 ms | 127 ms | 170 ms | 0% |
| Tag page | 3.98 | 84.3 ms | 122 ms | 177 ms | 0% |
| Author page | 3.98 | 85.9 ms | 114 ms | 124 ms | 0% |
| RSS feed | 3.93 | 91.2 ms | 118 ms | 140 ms | 0% |
| 16 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 7.83 | 519 ms | 633 ms | 672 ms | 0% |
| Post page | 19.6 | 424 ms | 536 ms | 597 ms | 0% |
| Tag page | 3.9 | 288 ms | 371 ms | 436 ms | 0% |
| Author page | 3.93 | 285 ms | 385 ms | 468 ms | 0% |
| RSS feed | 3.91 | 294 ms | 401 ms | 448 ms | 0% |

#### Staff in Ghost Admin

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 virtual user |
| --- |
| Post list | 3.63 | 41.6 ms | 55.9 ms | 68.4 ms | 0% |
| Post editor | 10.9 | 15.7 ms | 21.9 ms | 29.5 ms | 0% |
| Saving a draft | 10.9 | 38.6 ms | 50.3 ms | 67.1 ms | 0% |
| Member list | 3.65 | 47.7 ms | 64.2 ms | 77.4 ms | 0% |
| 4 virtual users |
| --- |
| Post list | 4.22 | 60.9 ms | 72.5 ms | 82.2 ms | 0% |
| Post editor | 12.7 | 30.2 ms | 38.4 ms | 49.5 ms | 0% |
| Saving a draft | 12.7 | 231 ms | 290 ms | 363 ms | 0% |
| Member list | 4.22 | 66.5 ms | 84 ms | 121 ms | 0% |

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 s per level, after a 20 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Ghost ran the way its ghost-docker setup runs it: one Node process, and MySQL with its stock 128 MB buffer pool. Memory peaked with Ghost at 347 MB and MySQL at 622 MB.

### Wagtail

#### Visitors

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 virtual user |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.25 | 108 ms | 115 ms | 117 ms | 0% |
| Blog index | 1.25 | 369 ms | 384 ms | 388 ms | 0% |
| Blog post | 3.71 | 33.8 ms | 51.3 ms | 54 ms | 0% |
| Bread page | 3.72 | 37.6 ms | 40.2 ms | 41.9 ms | 0% |
| Location page | 1.25 | 36.2 ms | 39.4 ms | 42.1 ms | 0% |
| Site search | 1.23 | 57.9 ms | 94.9 ms | 96 ms | 0% |
| 4 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.77 | 316 ms | 451 ms | 465 ms | 0% |
| Blog index | 1.82 | 1.11 s | 1.35 s | 1.45 s | 0% |
| Blog post | 5.33 | 90.7 ms | 151 ms | 186 ms | 0% |
| Bread page | 5.38 | 106 ms | 142 ms | 166 ms | 0% |
| Location page | 1.82 | 96.9 ms | 133 ms | 144 ms | 0% |
| Site search | 1.77 | 134 ms | 273 ms | 318 ms | 0% |
| 16 virtual users |
| --- |
| Home page | 1.83 | 1.03 s | 1.33 s | 1.48 s | 0% |
| Blog index | 1.87 | 2.53 s | 2.92 s | 3.16 s | 0% |
| Blog post | 5.49 | 574 ms | 881 ms | 1.02 s | 0% |
| Bread page | 5.49 | 601 ms | 931 ms | 1.03 s | 0% |
| Location page | 1.85 | 617 ms | 882 ms | 978 ms | 0% |
| Site search | 1.8 | 658 ms | 1.06 s | 1.22 s | 0% |

#### Editors in the Wagtail admin

| Step | Requests/s | Median | p95 | p99 | Error rate |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| 1 virtual user |
| --- |
| Admin dashboard | 0.461 | 116 ms | 139 ms | 143 ms | 0% |
| Page explorer | 0.939 | 519 ms | 651 ms | 671 ms | 0% |
| Page editor | 1.38 | 241 ms | 313 ms | 403 ms | 0% |
| Image library | 0.461 | 89.5 ms | 110 ms | 797 ms | 0% |
| Admin page search | 0.461 | 46.8 ms | 103 ms | 105 ms | 0% |
| 4 virtual users |
| --- |
| Admin dashboard | 0.622 | 401 ms | 725 ms | 812 ms | 0% |
| Page explorer | 1.28 | 1.47 s | 2.31 s | 2.55 s | 0% |
| Page editor | 1.88 | 717 ms | 1.12 s | 1.2 s | 0% |
| Image library | 0.622 | 427 ms | 700 ms | 726 ms | 0% |
| Admin page search | 0.622 | 164 ms | 418 ms | 506 ms | 0% |

k6 with a fixed number of virtual users, 60 to 61 s per level, after a 21 s warmup. The error rate counts responses that weren't a 200. Wagtail ran the way bakerydemo ships it: uWSGI with 2 workers of 4 threads each, whatever the box, and Postgres and Redis on stock settings. Memory peaked with Wagtail at 294 MB, Postgres at 158 MB, and Redis at 26 MB.

## Advertised vs. measured

| Spec | Advertised | Measured |
| --- | --- | --- |
| vCPU | 2 | 2 |
| CPU | Dedicated vCPU | 0% of busy CPU time stolen |
| RAM | 4 GB | 3.8 GiB |
| Storage | 80 GB SSD | 78.2 GiB |
| Architecture | x86\_64 | x86\_64 |
| Virtualization | KVM | KVM |

Guests usually report slightly less RAM and disk than advertised because of kernel reservations and filesystem overhead.

## Detected hardware

**CPU model:** AMD EPYC 7713 64-Core Processor

**CPU cores:** 2

**CPU frequency:** 2000 MHz

**AES-NI:** Yes

**VM-x/AMD-V:** No

**RAM reported:** 3.8 GiB

**Swap reported:** 496 MiB

**Disk reported:** 78.2 GiB

**Virtualization reported:** KVM

**CPU steal:** 0% of busy CPU time stolen

**Distro:** Ubuntu 24.04.4 LTS

**Kernel:** 6.8.0-134-generic

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**IPv4 reachable:** Yes

**IPv6 reachable:** Yes

## Advertised at test time

**Plan:** Dedicated 4GB

**Product line:** Dedicated CPU

**Location:** Chicago, IL

**vCPU:** 2 dedicated vCPU

**Architecture:** x86\_64

**RAM:** 4 GB

**Storage:** 80 GB SSD

**Virtualization:** KVM

**Network:** 4 Gbps

**Transfer:** 4 TB

**Port 25:** On request

**Monthly price at test time:** $36.00

**Hourly price at test time:** $0.054

**YABS version:** v2026-09-20

**Ran at:** Oct 13, 2026, 12:26:43 UTC

**Parser version:** 5

## Run timeline

**Queued:** Oct 13, 2026, 12:24:00 UTC

**Server created:** Oct 13, 2026, 12:26:11 UTC

**First update from the server:** Oct 13, 2026, 12:26:11 UTC

**Completed:** Oct 13, 2026, 14:10:11 UTC

**Server deleted:** Oct 13, 2026, 14:10:11 UTC

**Cost of this run:** $0.096

Tests 67 of 67 done Live output 801 lines

Setup 2 cores, 3.8 GiB RAM 4 of 4Done

Disk (fio) 315 MB/s at 4k, 5.48 GB/s at 1m 5 of 5Done

Network, IPv4 (iperf3) Median 1.94 Gbit/s send, 2.10 Gbit/s receive, 1 retried 5 of 5Done

Geekbench 7, single-core Score 1,061 17 of 17Done

Geekbench 7, multi-core Score 1,377 9 of 9Done

Phoronix (memory, TLS, scheduler) 3 of 3Done

Datastores 5 of 5Done

Web frameworks 18 of 18Done

Finish Results saved 1 of 1Done

Watch party 0 watching

This party closed at 15:10 UTC. It's read only now.

## Watch party

Loading the party