DigitalOcean Basic 4 vCPU / 8 GB benchmarks

4 shared vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 160 GB SSD

[Shared CPU](https://rackcensus.com/vps-categories/shared-cpu-vps-benchmarks)

$48.00/mo

$0.071/hr

$52.14/mo at 730 hours

[Visit DigitalOcean](https://rackcensus.com/go/digitalocean)

# Performance by location
[Every run of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks?filter%5Bplan%5D=digitalocean-s-4vcpu-8gb&filter%5Bsort%5D=location)

Medians over the last 90 days. Same plan, same provider, different datacenters. Multi per $ divides the multi-core median by each location's current monthly price, USD only.

Price position

Cheaper than 28% of 32 similar plans

Same vCPU count and CPU type, 6 to 11 GB RAM, median $40

| Location | Runs | GB7 single | GB7 multi | 4K IOPS | Price | Multi per $ | Last tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| Amsterdam 3 Amsterdam, NL | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| Bangalore 1 Bangalore, IN | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| Frankfurt 1 Frankfurt, DE | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| London 1 London, GB | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| New York 1 New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| New York 2 New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| New York 3 New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| San Francisco 2 San Francisco, CA, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| San Francisco 3 San Francisco, CA, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| Singapore 1 Singapore, SG | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| Sydney 1 Sydney, NSW, AU | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| Toronto 1 Toronto, ON, CA | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $48.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |

A location is highlighted only when it leads the next best by 5 percent or more. Smaller gaps are normal run-to-run variance.

Network results are not compared here. iperf3 targets are third-party servers, so distance to each target dominates the number.