DigitalOcean General Purpose 2 vCPU / 8 GB benchmarks

2 dedicated vCPU, 8 GB RAM, 25 GB SSD

[Dedicated CPU](https://rackcensus.com/vps-categories/dedicated-cpu-vps-benchmarks)[General Purpose](https://rackcensus.com/vps-categories/general-purpose-vps-benchmarks)

$63.00/mo

$0.094/hr

$68.44/mo at 730 hours

[Visit DigitalOcean](https://rackcensus.com/go/digitalocean)

Referral link. If you sign up through it, I may get paid.

[Skip the referral](https://rackcensus.com/go/digitalocean/direct)[How this works](https://rackcensus.com/transparency#referrals-heading)

# Performance by location
[Every run of this plan](https://rackcensus.com/benchmarks?filter%5Bplan%5D=digitalocean-general-purpose-2-vcpu-8-gb&filter%5Bsort%5D=location)

Medians over the last 90 days. Multi per $ is the multi-core median divided by the current monthly price, USD only.

Price position

Cheaper than 14% of 7 similar plans

Same vCPU count and CPU type, 6 to 11 GB RAM, median $44

| Location | Runs | GB7 single | GB7 multi | 4K IOPS | Price | Multi per $ | Last tested |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [Bangalore 1](https://rackcensus.com/locations/bangalore-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Bangalore") Bangalore, IN | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $63.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [London 1](https://rackcensus.com/locations/london-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in London") London, GB | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $63.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [New York 1](https://rackcensus.com/locations/new-york-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in New York") New York, NY, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $63.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [San Francisco 2](https://rackcensus.com/locations/san-francisco-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in San Francisco") San Francisco, CA, US | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $63.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
| [Singapore 1](https://rackcensus.com/locations/singapore-vps-benchmarks "Every provider in Singapore") Singapore, SG | 0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $63.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |

A location is highlighted only when it leads the next best by 5 percent or more. Smaller gaps are normal run-to-run variance.

Network results are not compared here. iperf3 targets are third-party servers, so distance to each target dominates the number.