OneProvider General Purpose 8 vCPU / 16 GB RAM / 320 GB SSD / 6144 GB transfer benchmarks
8 shared vCPU, 16 GB RAM, 320 GB SSD
Performance by location
Every run of this planMedians over the last 90 days. Same plan, same provider, different datacenters. Multi per $ divides the multi-core median by each location's current monthly price, USD only.
Price position
$18$206
Cheaper than 53% of 19 similar plans
Same vCPU count and CPU type, 12 to 21 GB RAM, median $112
| Location | Runs | GB7 single | GB7 multi | 4K IOPS | Price | Multi per $ | Last tested |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Bangkok, TH
Bangkok, TH
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Bogota, CO
Bogota, CO
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Brussels, BE
Brussels, BE
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Buenos Aires, AR
Buenos Aires, AR
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Dubai, AE
Dubai, AE
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Istanbul, TR
Istanbul, TR
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Kuala Lumpur, MY
Kuala Lumpur, MY
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
La Paz, BO
La Paz, BO
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Mexico City, MX
Mexico City, MX
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Moscow, RU
Moscow, RU
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Nicosia, CY
Nicosia, CY
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Quito, EC
Quito, EC
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
San Jose, CR
San Jose, CR
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
San Juan, PR
San Juan, PR
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
|
Tel Aviv, IL
Tel Aviv, IL
|
0 | n/a | n/a | n/a | $100.00/mo | n/a | Not tested yet |
A location is highlighted only when it leads the next best by 5 percent or more. Smaller gaps are normal run-to-run variance.
Network results are not compared here. iperf3 targets are third-party servers, so distance to each target dominates the number.